Assessing the Economic Feasibility of Needle-Retractable Safety Syringes (NRSS) Adoption in Indian Healthcare Facilities

Abstract

Description: Globally, sixteen billion injections are given each year, 95.00% of which are for medicinal purposes. This global injection burden is accounted for by India between 24.5% and 31.0%, and alarmingly, over 62.50% of these injections are performed improperly or are repeated.

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the increased costs incurred by transitioning from traditional disposable syringes to Needle-Retractable Safety Syringes (NRSS) for beneficial usage in India.

Methods: Utilizing a decision tree model, we evaluated the occurrence of needle-stick injuries and syringe reuse among healthcare personnel and patients. We calculated the lifetime costs associated with HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus, HBV - Hepatitis B Virus, and HCV - Hepatitis C Virus infections using three Markov models.

Results: NRSS offer substantial benefits by reducing needle-stick injuries and preventing blood-borne infections. Among the options analyzed, Reuse Prevention (RUP) syringes emerged as the most cost-effective choice. In contrast, Single-Use Prevention (SIP) and NRSS syringes are currently not deemed cost-effective at their prevailing prices. We recommend prioritizing RUP syringes and exploring strategies to make them more affordable for broader accessibility.

Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that, in the Indian context, RUP syringes present an economically viable solution. However, SIP and NRSS syringes do not currently offer cost-effectiveness. To enhance the cost-effectiveness of NRSS, concerted efforts should be directed towards reducing their price.

Abbreviations: NRSS, Needle-Retractable Safety Syringes; RUP, Reuse Prevention; SIP, Single-Use Prevention; NSI, Needle Stick Injuries; BBI, Blood-borne Infections; QOL, Quality-of-life; BCC, Behavior Change Communication.